Responding to RFPs manually is soul-crushing, time-consuming, and, frankly, outdated. You’ve got much better things to do than filling out a mind-numbing amount of questionnaires.

Lucky for you, you don’t actually need to drown in RFPs and questionnaires because you can automate RFPs now. 

But you don’t want to shell out more money and more time for software, which ends up being yet another headache. Or worse, deal with a system that nickel-and-dimes you for every new feature. 

So, in this article, we’re going to take a close look at Loopio and its alternatives to figure out what’s what. 

Let’s dive in.

Loopio alternatives at a glance 

Tool Top FeatureFree Trial? Starting Price
ResponsiveCollaboration on projects with multiple team members N/AN/A
1upFast questionnaire automation capabilities$250 / month
HighspotContent management and organization toolsN/AN/A
SeismicSales team enablement allows for specific hub building NoN/A
QorusDocsContent management N/AN/A
VantaAutomated security compliance responses $7,500 / year
QvidianResponding to large, complex financial docsN/AN/A 

The Downsides of Loopio

Before jumping into Loopio competitors, let’s look at why you might be considering those other guys. Let’s be real: there’s a reason you’re here. Loopio looks great at face value. The website is awesome. The vibe is cool. And the offerings seem plentiful. But there are some issues with this automated response software. 

In general, we’re seeing users report a clunky, and often slow, user interface. They also note that export options can be problematic, with difficulty uploading and matching exact documents. 

Loopio’s AI answer feature was known as “Magic” but to users we speak with, it’s not all that magical.

In fact, the worst thing users report about Loopio is the need to maintain a large answer library. 

“By the time you’ve completed your 3rd or 4th RFP, you now have hundreds of question and answer pairs to maintain. This becomes a full time job, with a need for constant reviews of your Q&A base.”

– Loopio User of 2 years

Here are some issues we’ve heard from users:

  • Trouble building and managing the content library: The idea behind a content library in automated response software is that you add to it, and you can search it easily. But Loopio’s AI has trouble discovering files and docs if they’re not managed by the user.
  • Complex DDQs are difficult to complete: Loopio struggles with formats that are not easily recognizable, so the user ends up having to enter questions manually. You also need to spend time mapping fields and sections of the document. Now, you’re stuck doing the exact thing you were trying to avoid—manual data entry. Fun times.
  • Users often find it difficult to use, with little training: Loopio does not offer enough demonstrations or “try me” options for new users to explore. So, basically for the first month or so, users just fumble around and pray they don’t break something.
  • No free trial: While Loopio does offer a demo option if you enter your contact information, there is no free trial. Also, there’s no price list on the website, just a section that explains the plans. In each case, you’ll have to book a sales call with a representative hoping they don’t upsell you into oblivion. It would be great to not have to spend all that time only to find out the plans are way outside budget. Worse, you sign a super expensive plan and find out you hate it!

Loopio competitors to streamline automated responses

Now that we know what we don’t love about Loopio, let’s look at the competition.  

Responsive

Loopio Alternative: Responsive

Responsive, formerly known as RFPIO, is a great project management feature and positions itself as a Strategic Response Management platform, “powering all types of information exchange across an opportunity lifecycle.”

However, it still operates like a traditional content management system (CMS), a lot like Loopio. That means users are still stuck maintaining a massive knowledge base, constantly updating responses, and cleaning up outdated or duplicate answers. 

If that part of the process isn’t well-managed, the AI pulls in incorrect or irrelevant content—defeating the whole purpose of automation.

Responsive offers many features but just like with Loopio, some users find the interface more complex than it needs to be, making onboarding and everyday use a bit of a slog.

Key Points
Use casesResponsive is a response platform for RFPs and questionnaires.  
Standout featureCollaboration on projects with multiple team members 
Tracking and analyticsUsers can analyze RFPs to find key requirements and potential issues
IntegrationsUsers can integrate with dozens of other platforms, like Confluence, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Google Sheets, and more.
Customer supportUsers can access a knowledge base for answers to common questions or submit a contact form for more niche help
Top Features
  • Centralized Content Library
  • Automated Workflows
  • Customization Options
  • Analytics that Track Performance 
Pricing

Responsive does not offer a free trial.  And the specific pricing info is nowhere to be found. The company asks you to contact sales to discuss their professional, business, and enterprise plans.

  • Professional Plan: Contact Sales
  • Business Plan: Contact Sales
  • Enterprise Plan: Contact Sales
Pros and Cons of Responsive
ProsCons
Manage every step of the RFP on the platformWeak automation capabilities, requiring you to maintain your knowledge base, always update responses, and clean up answers
Detailed insight with advanced analyticsNo pricing information, and no free trial
Easy collaboration with your team and clientsFormatting issues when cutting and pasting
Too many options and features can be confusing 
Document and column mapping requires significant effort

1up

How to Automate RFP Questionnaires with 1up

We get that self-promoting like this does look a little biased, but don’t just take it from us. Just ask companies like FusionAuth, WalkMe, and Deliveroo why they chose 1up to automate sales questionnaires as their top Loopio alternative.

1up has built a reputation for having a single source of truth — you — that is always reliable and always accurate. We’ll connect directly to your source material, and our AI, K.B. will pull answers in record time. It will even include links back to the source. 

Your team members can ask questions directly in their messaging system, like Slack, MS Teams, or Google Chat. Or, you can export a Word Doc or Excel Sheet to be automatically filled out. No doc to upload? 1up helps with web-based questionnaires, too.

Loopio Competitor: 1up
Key Points
Use cases1up is an AI that will get your sales team answers to any question from your own internal source material.
Standout featureFastest automation capabilities for questionnaires
Tracking and analytics1up analyzes your company’s knowledge sources and updates them in real-time.
IntegrationsUsers can integrate Slack, Google Chat, and MS Teams. 1up also has a Browser Extension.
Customer supportUsers can email support or talk with a real person in a live chat.
Top Features
  • Automated Question Answering
  • Rapid Onboarding 
  • Automated Multi-Question RFP and Questionnaire Responses 
  • Knowledge Base for Accurate Answers 
  • Workflow Management 
Pricing

1up offers a 14-day free trial and starter, as well as pro and enterprise plans.

  • 1up Starter: From $250 per month
  • 1up Pro: From $850 per month
  • 1up Enterprise: Contact sales to discuss
Pros and Cons of 1up
ProsCons
Generate responses in seconds and minutes instead of hours or days Limited Enterprise audit logging capabilities
Offers live chat support with a real humanLive Chat support limited to North America working hours
Takes minutes to setup instead of days or weeksWhite-glove onboarding limited to Enterprise plan
Fills out complex sheets and files with hundreds of lines with ease across Excel, Word, PDF, and Web-based questionnairesDoes not export custom PDF templates
Accurate responses pulled from your internal documents, website, and provides sources for where the data was retrieved
The platform is super easy to use with tons of integrations with Slack, MS Teams, and more
Provides translations to answers in more than 50 different languages, so you can automate questionnaires even if you’re a multinational company

Highspot 

Loopio Competition: Highspot

Highspot’s claim to fame is that it is the only unified sales enablement platform. The company offers AI-driven GTM enablement to define, execute, and optimize initiatives and get them to the market. 

However, there is no RFP automation offered with Highspot, making it a poor alternative to Loopio if that’s your primary goal. 

The platform also offers companies avenues for training and coaching team members along the way. Each feature builds unified AI assistance into the process, automating repetitive tasks and responses. 

Key Points
Use casesIdeal for enterprise companies hyper-focused on GTM initiatives 
Standout featureCompletely unified sales enablement platform 
Tracking and analyticsUsers can analyze pitch performance in real-time
IntegrationsIntegrates with MS Copilot for Sales, Bynder, Groove, Salesforce, and Slack 
Customer supportUsers can email for round-the-clock support
Top Features
  • Centralized Content Library
  • Content Personalization
  • Live Learning
  • AI-driven Coaching
  • Real-time Dashboards
Pricing

Highspot does not offer a free trial. Interested parties will need to contact sales to get pricing information.

Pros and Cons of Highspot
ProsCons
Presents content in an easy-to-consume wayHighspot is not used as an RFP or questionnaire automation system
Can share, collaborate, and send files internally and externallySharing could be easier, particularly for internal colleagues who don’t have access to Highspot
The search mechanism is highly accurateDuplicate management of assets can be difficult 
Ability to follow client engagement Content management becomes a full-time job, with dated assets requiring constant updates
Seat-based pricing limits adoption internally
Setup can take a long time with significant effort

Seismic 

Loopio Alternative: Seismic

Seismic is a sales enablement platform that helps you store all your content in one place and access it with speed and ease. It does not offer any RFP automation. 

The founders saw a need for sales and marketing teams to “become more nimble and deliver personalization and customization for their customers.” 

The specific goal of Seismic is to automate the creation of pitchbooks, making it easier for teams to present their products in modern, innovative ways. 

Seismic aims to save users time and money as they build content. 

Key Points
Use casesIt can be used by client-facing teams to build and revise pitchbooks
Standout featureSales team enablement allows for specific hub-building 
Tracking and analyticsUsers can analyze a complete picture of prospect engagement via a customizable dashboard 
IntegrationsUsers can integrate with several applications, including MS Office, Google Workspace, Salesforce, and more
Customer supportUsers can email support, fill out a contact form, or chat live with AI
Top Features
  • Large, Centralized Knowledge Base
  • Collaboration Tools to Create Hubs for Specific Teams 
  • Customizable Content
  • Interactive Modules for Learning and Coaching
Pricing
  • Seismic does not provide pricing information on its website. Interested parties will need to contact sales.
Pros and Cons of Seismic
ProsCons
Easy platform functionality and easy to navigateCannot automate RFPs or questionnaires
A powerful tool for automating financial reportsVery expensive according to user reports
Wonderful analytics and insights toolsDifficulty syncing documents 
Too few upgrades, so the system begins to feel outdated over time
UX could be more intuitive 

QorusDocs

Loopio Competitor: QorusDocs

QorusDocs is named as this automated response software goes above and beyond RFPs and questionnaires. You can also automate pitches, presentations, and even statements of work. It’s like ChatGPT combined with automated response software. The best of both worlds. 

The team also has experts in legal documents, architecture and engineering, and IT services, so you can be sure you’re getting professional help with your docs. 

Key Points
Use casesQorusDocs is ideal for teams looking for automated content for proposal management 
Standout featureQPilot, the AI assistant over at QorusDocs is their big sell
Tracking and analyticsCan track how recipients engage with proposals 
IntegrationsQorusDocs integrates with all Microsoft products
Customer supportContact support via a ticket or find answers to your question with several user guides
Top Features
  • AI-Powered Proposals
  • Proposal Collaboration
  • Integration with Microsoft
  • Proposal Engagement Tracking
Pricing
  • QorusDocs does not offer a free trial. Interested parties will need to request a demo and contact sales to get pricing information.
Pros and Cons of QorusDocs
ProsCons
Ability to customize QorusDocs to match CRM systems It can be difficult to set up and understand, requires a lot of training 
Native to Microsoft Office, so easy to manage with those systems The onboarding process is a nightmare, requiring intensive training, and even after that, support is often needed since the website is so complex.
Strong customer supportThe search capability is not optimal, and too many fields to fill out when closing a case 
Dashboard could be more intuitive according to user feedback

Vanta

Loopio Alternative: Vanta

Vanta is an automated response software specifically designed to support security questionnaire responses, this means no help to sales teams. 

The system can automate evidence collection for 35+ compliance frameworks. Vanta also offers continuous GRC and vendor risk management. 

For startups and other companies struggling with compliance issues, Vanta offers tons of resources. 

Key Points
Use casesIt is used to help mitigate security risk
Standout featureAutomated security compliance responses 
Tracking and analyticsAllows you to track all third-party apps used in your organization
IntegrationsIntegrates with 75+ platforms such as AWS, Azure, Github
Customer supportOffers help articles, a community forum for asking questions, and self-paced courses for training
Top Features
  • Automated Compliance Tasks
  • Continuous Monitoring 
  • Large Number of Integrations
  • Tools for Risk Assessment 
Pricing

Vanta does not offer a free trial. You can request a demo to discuss Core, Growth, and Scale plans. 

  • Core Plan: Request a Demo
  • Growth Plan: Request a Demo
  • Scale Plan: Request a Demo
Pros and Cons of Vanta
ProsCons
Support team is quick to respond Vanta does not help with RFPs at all
Easy to use interface offers reminders of tasks and due dates Is limited to GRC, is not adopted or used by Sales teams
Audit readiness Control descriptions for SOC2 are too generic 
Ease of integration with other applicationsPricey for what you get, especially for small businesses 

Qvidian

Loopio Alternative: Qvidian

Qvidian, powered by Upland, is proud of its 40+ years of industry experience in sales and content creation. The team at Qvidian is made up of professional, technical, and educational service teams. 

They consider themselves proposal experts, and this automated response software is dedicated to just that — winning proposals. 

Specifically, Qvidian is ideal for financial services companies looking to win more deals. 

Key Points
Use casesQvidian has proven to be helpful to financial services companies in drafting quality proposals and simplify compliance.
Standout featureResponding to large, complex financial docs
Tracking and analyticsQvidian Analytics is a feature that allows users to monitor recipient engagement. 
IntegrationsQvidian works with products like Microsoft Office and Salesforce 
Customer supportUsers can login and chat with the AI, browse through training docs, or ask questions on a community forum.
Top Features
  • Collaboration Tools
  • Analytics 
  • Workflow 
  • Audit Trail
Pricing

Qvidian software by Upland does not offer pricing information on its website. Interested parties will need to request a demo or chat with sales to get more information.

Pros and Cons of Qvidian
ProsCons
Library features and organization help keep information accessible and organized Document architecture is extremely technical 
Support is next level, with questions answers quickly and accurately Content update process is cumbersome
User interface is super intuitive, with new stylish updateMerge codes are not optimized for automation
Robust functionality 

Found the best Loopio alternative?

Ultimately, you’ve got to decide which automated response software makes the most sense for you and your company. Each company has different needs and varying levels of complexity for their projects. You also have to consider your budget and the scale of work you expect over the next several months or years. 

The good news is some Loopio competitors offer a free trial, all of them offer a demo, and many of the alternatives give you insight into their overall vibe.

1up offers you all three — a free trial, a demo, and a great vibe. If you’re ready to learn more, book a 1up demo today.